_


  • Marccooper5_1

Back To Home Page

« Working Not Posting | Main | Weekend Reading Assignment »

Saturday, December 11, 2004

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8342139a953ef00e55080773a8834

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Bye Bye Bernie:

» My Only Post About Bernard Kerik from Beautiful Horizons
I am happy that Bernard Kerik has withdrawn his name from consideration as Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security, but like so many others I'm not buying the nanny excuse and here's why:But there may have been other issues [Read More]

Comments

jim hitchcock

Guess it's fair to say Bush won't be endorsing Rudy in his future presidential run. Of course, the chances for THAT just dimmed a bit.

rosedog

Hi Marc. Wondered if you'd be able to resist commenting. Well, you sure called it right. Goodness but Kerik turned out to be quite the creep! Yikes!

I agree, Gary Hart is still the best man for the job. More than any national figure, he's made this his area of expertise, and he's a bright guy who's actually gotten better over the years. It's unfortunate that partisanship stands in the way of his name being up for consideration. I mean, it'd be mighty nice if for one millisecond Bush acted as if he was President for all Americans, instead of merely the half of the country who voted for him.

About, Bratton: Fugedaboudit. The administration can't have 'im. (Even if they did want him.) He belongs to LA for another three years at the very least, and we ain't giving him up. Besides, Rikki (Kleiman) would throw one majorly impressive fit if Bill even whispers about moving back to the right coast any time soon. Trust me on this one.

too many steves

Good Call!

Don't get your hopes up for the naming of the replacement - I mean, Bush picked Kerik in the first place and I understand Mineta is staying on at his post.

Bratton would be great because of his pedigree and well documented success - but I'm conflicted about whether this job is best done by someone close to the ground or if it needs a high-end visionary who can administer and manage a vast bureaucracy.

And I'm confused by your fascination with Gary Hart. I can't get the picture of him with that huge mop of windblown hair and the blonde bimbo sitting on his lap out of my head. Is it the same guy and, if so, what has he done since then that impresses you so?

Clare Quilty

"And I'm confused by your fascination with Gary Hart"

Well, "too many," I believe it was Emerson who said something to the effect that the rebels of yesterday are the stuffed shirts of today. But here I'm thinking more of Mr. Cooper's exaltation of and awe for a crushing failure like Hitchens as a political thinker and commentator.

Randy Paul

of course it had nothing to do with the nanny issue. The Bush administraton, in their eagerness to engage in a political debt payment to Rudy Giuliani, announced the Kerik nomination before the FBI background check was even complete. Remember, this adminstration is the one that is supposed to be so adept at protecting the country, but they were caught off guard by a nominee for a position to oversee that security who had more skeletons in his closet than every amusement park scary ride in the nation.

The one I really hope this hurts is Giuliani, the dictator-coddling, corrupt favor granting, vindictive ex-mayor of my city. God help us if he ever ascends any higher in the political cosmos.

reg

What's sad about this story is that Rudy Giuliani should have been the nominee and should have been the man who could bring some real energy and ideas to the department. According to his profile he's got an emotional connection to this issue and the kind of credibility to make the department work, gain public trust, get Congress' attention, etc. I say "should", but I don't think the Rudy Giuliani who "should" have been America's great domestic security point man actually exists. And if he did, this administration is so cultish, insular and cowardly that they wouldn't have been able to tolerate him in their circle.

Marc Cooper

A couple of comments...
Clare Quilty: us usuallu wittier than this. I appreciate your concern for my alleged "awe" over Hitchens. I suggest you focus on a more mundane explanatiom known as: FRIENDSHIP. And, alas, I have friends and even family members who are NRA members, Bush supporters and what-have you. Thems the breaks...

Randy: Agreed re Rudy. He's a much over-rated snarling attack doggie. Agreed also with your other thought... After three years of telling us that only this Administration is tenacious enough to protect us, after the Patriot act, after the beefing up of federal police powers and intelligence, it seems the Bush White House couldnt adequately perform a thorough vetting of its man to head up the whole show. Kinda makes you wonder, doesnt it?

Cridland

Does it matter? Isn't this position the quintessence of a impotent, technocratic figurehead?

I'm amazed the way so many people have decided that the Dept of Homeland Security is a good way for us to get our needs met. Hell, we're not even through making fun of the *name*.

steve

The best hope for Homeland Security, even better than Kerkik backing down is that the Pentagon says more than 5,500 servicemen have deserted since the war started in Iraq.

PJ

My preference would be to do away with the whole agency.

Unfortunately, an illegal-nanny-employing, paw-in-every-honey-pot, two-bit bureaucratic poobah is the rule, not the exception, in boondoggle governmental agencies. If groping women passengers at LAX is the extent of their mission, why bother?

If they have accomplished anything (besides giving jobs to people who would otherwise be on the dole), I wish someone would tell me and make me feel better.

Randy Paul

Marc,

I stopped wondering long ago and just cross myself and pray every time the 7 train goes into the tunnel or everytime I ride the subway below ground.

The comments to this entry are closed.